Analysis paralysis?

There comes a point in any research where you simply have to stop reading what other people have written. This is difficult because there are so many multi-branching and diverging avenues your reading can take you down. This was far less of a problem when I was an undergraduate in the 1990s because it was quicker to establish whether or not something was a blind alley: this was often the result because the university library simply did not subscribe to the journal in which you were interested and by the time an inter-library loan came through, the course was over and you were into the summer holiday!

Of course it’s far better now, you can satisfy yourself that you really have read everything that has been published in the English language that is available electronically, but the amount of time that takes! I’m trying to put my literature review together for the introduction and methodology sections of my dissertation but I just keep finding new stuff! I just found a really interesting article on organisational blogging and how it was found to give an organisation a more human voice in the perceptions of its readers; this is an intuitive truth but of course empirical evidence is always key. Then of course you look in Google Scholar and do a citation search on your key references and that’s another afternoon gone.

At some point, information overload kicks in and it’s time for a cup of tea….

Professional networking software, surely?

Now here’s an interesting thing about a survey of UK government workers wanting to use social networking tools for their work (i.e. not playing Path Words on Facebook) but management just not “getting it”. The whole “social” networking terminology has been superseded surely. There are so many fantastic applications that can help you do your job more efficiently, effectively and cost-effectively thanks to these apps and platforms.

Access to my survey has been blocked by the web controls of many public libraries in the UK; I haven’t had that response from any of the many US respondents. This just adds more strength to my argument that professionals need to be accorded a level of respect according to their abilities and given the opportunity to communicate in these meaningful, interesting and often fruitful ways.

Public library survey is go!

Well here it is at long last, I’ve piloted and tweaked and hope it tells me what I want to know about public libraries engagement with Library 2.0. I’m not so keen on the “social” networking name of all the sites and applications this entails as there’s so much that it professional in their functionality now.

Please take my survey, I’ll love you forever (well, I’ll say thank you)

Anyhoo, here’s the info:

My name is Sarah Hammond and I am conducting some research in fulfilment of my MA in Librarianship at the University of Sheffield. I am interested in how public libraries and librarians feel about the use of so-called social networking websites and software as a tool for the library and its various functions.

I am interested in obtaining the views of as many public librarians who canspare a few moments to complete this survey but if you do not wish to but thinkone of your colleagues might, then please forward it on to them. Could I ask you to please spare a few minutes to whizz through my survey?

Kind regards

Sarah Hammond

Student on the MA in Librarianship programme

Department of Information Studies

University of Sheffield

http://www.shef.ac.uk/is/

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑